Jochen Kluve

Research Fellow

KfW Development Bank

Jochen Kluve is Director of Evaluation at KfW Development Bank and Professor of Economics at the School of Business and Economics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Previously, he was Head of the Berlin Office and Head of the Labor Markets unit of RWI, and a postdoctoral fellow at the University of California, Berkeley. He studied economics in Heidelberg, Dublin and Amsterdam and completed his PhD at the University of Heidelberg. His research has been published in World Development, the Economic Journal, Journal of the European Economic Association, Journal of Applied Econometrics, and Labour Economics, among others.

Jochen joined IZA as a Research Affiliate in March 2000 and became a Research Fellow in May 2002.

Filter

IZA-Publikationen

IZA Discussion Paper No. 8115
Jochen Kluve, Sebastian Schmitz
revised version published as 'Back to Work: parental benefits and mothers' labor market outcomes in the medium-run' in: Industrial and Labor Relations Review 2018, 71 (1), 143 - 173
IZA Discussion Paper No. 6565
revised version published as 'The impact of training duration on employment outcomes: Evidence from LATE estimates' in: Economics Letters, 2013, 120 (3), 487-490
IZA Discussion Paper No. 6195
revised version published in: Journal of Development Effectiveness, 2011, 3 (4), 567-588
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4500
revised version published as 'Parental Leave Regulations, Mothers' Labor Force Attachment and Fathers' Childcare Involvement: Evidence from a Natural Experiment' in: Journal of Population Economics, 2013, 26 (3), 983-1005
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4002
published in: The Economic Journal, 2010, 120, F452-F477
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3875
published in: German Economic Review, 2009, 10(2), 224-242
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2100
published in: Journal for Labour Market Research / Zeitschrift für Arbeitsmarktforschung, 2007, 40 (1), 45-64
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2018
revised version published as 'The effectiveness of European active labor market programs' in: Labour Economics, 2010, 17 (6), 904-918
Typ
Anzeige
Typ