published in: Industrial Relations, 2004, 43 (2), 305-323
Sequential analyses of the major workplace data sets available to British researchers – the
Workplace Industrial/Employee Relations Surveys (WIRS/WERS) – have revealed shifts in
some previously solid relationships between union presence and a variety of establishment
performance indicators. So much so that it is now conventional to speak of a pronounced
reduction in the 'disadvantages of unionism' in that country. One finding that seems to have
persisted in cross section, however, is the negative effect of unions on employment growth.
Following on a recent study of AWIRS (Wooden and Hawke, 2000), we reexamine the issue
using new panel data from the WERS series, where workplaces were surveyed in 1990 and
then followed-up in 1998. We report similar evidence of employment retardation in union
regimes. Moreover, use of the panel also hints that some other unfavorable union effects
may be longer standing than suggested in cross-section work.
We use cookies to provide you with an optimal website experience. This includes cookies that are necessary for the operation of the site as well as cookies that are only used for anonymous statistical purposes, for comfort settings or to display personalized content. You can decide for yourself which categories you want to allow. Please note that based on your settings, you may not be able to use all of the site's functions.
Cookie settings
These necessary cookies are required to activate the core functionality of the website. An opt-out from these technologies is not available.
In order to further improve our offer and our website, we collect anonymous data for statistics and analyses. With the help of these cookies we can, for example, determine the number of visitors and the effect of certain pages on our website and optimize our content.