Die IZA Discussion Papers (ISSN: 2365-9793) gilt mit ihren über 17.000 Titeln als die wichtigste Schriftenreihe dieser Art in der Arbeitsökonomie. Mitglieder des IZA-Netzwerks stellen hier ihre aktuellen Forschungsresultate vorab zur Diskussion, bevor sie Eingang in Fachzeitschriften finden. Das IZA leistet damit einen wichtigen Beitrag zur wissenschaftlichen Qualitätssicherung.

Per E-Mail-Abo können Sie sich über die Neuerscheinungen informieren lassen. Für Autoren aus dem IZA-Netzwerk gelten unsere Submission Guidelines.

Suche nach:

Die Eingabe im Feld Suche ist nicht gültig.
Suchtipps
Platzhalter

Das Zeichen * kann als Platzhalter verwendet werden. Zum Beispiel: *berg

Filter

Typ
Typ
16 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 15965
Home Bias in Top Economics Journals
Dirk Bethmann, Felix Bransch, Michael Kvasnicka, Abdolkarim Sadrieh
IZA Discussion Paper No. 15739
Aging in Style: Does How We Write Matter?
Daniel S. Hamermesh, Lea-Rachel Kosnik
IZA Discussion Paper No. 14484
Gender Differences in Peer Recognition by Economists
David Card, Stefano DellaVigna, Patricia Funk, Nagore Iriberri
IZA Discussion Paper No. 13045
Article Length and Citation Outcomes
Syed Hasan, Robert Breunig
IZA Discussion Paper No. 12887
Influence in Economics and Aging
Pavel Jelnov, Yoram Weiss
published in: Labour Economics, 2022, 77, 101992
IZA Discussion Paper No. 12866
Is Scholarly Refereeing Productive (at the Margin)?
Aboozar Hadavand, Daniel S. Hamermesh, Wesley W. Wilson
IZA Discussion Paper No. 11868
Publishing and Promotion in Economics: The Tyranny of the Top Five
James J. Heckman, Sidharth Moktan
published in: Journal of Economic Literature, 58 (2), 2020, 419 - 70
IZA Discussion Paper No. 11762
Predicting Retirement Savings Using Survey Measures of Exponential-Growth Bias and Present Bias
Gopi Shah Goda, Matthew R. Levy, Colleen Flaherty Manchester, Aaron Sojourner, Joshua Tasoff
published in: Economic Inquiry, 2019, 57 (3), 1636 - 1658
IZA Discussion Paper No. 11089
Male Gatekeepers Gender Bias in the Publishing Process?
Felix Bransch, Michael Kvasnicka
published in: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2022, 202, 714-732
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8829
The Objective Measurement of World-Leading Research
Andrew J. Oswald
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8432
Collaborating With People Like Me: Ethnic Co-authorship within the US
Richard B. Freeman, Wei Huang
published in: Journal of Labor Economics, 2015, 33 (3), S1 / Part 2, S289-S318.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 7024
How Should Peer-Review Panels Behave?
Daniel Sgroi, Andrew J. Oswald
published in: Economic Journal, 2013, 123 (570), 255-278
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4313
A Suggested Method for the Measurement of World-Leading Research (Illustrated with Data on Economics)
Andrew J. Oswald
published in: Scientometrics, 2010, 84 (1), 99 - 113
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4005
The Elite Brain Drain
Rosalind S. Hunter, Andrew J. Oswald, Bruce G. Charlton
published in: Economic Journal, 2009, 119 (538), F231 - F251
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3665
Can We Test for Bias in Scientific Peer-Review?
Andrew J. Oswald
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2070
An Examination of the Reliability of Prestigious Scholarly Journals: Evidence and Implications for Decision-makers
Andrew J. Oswald
published in: Economica, 2007, 74 (293), 21-31
Typ
Anzeige
20 50 100
Typ