5.219 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4084
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4079
published as 'An Activation Program as a Stick to Job Finding' in: Labour, 2011, 25 (2), 167 - 181
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4079
published as 'An Activation Program as a Stick to Job Finding' in: Labour, 2011, 25 (2), 167 - 181
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4077
Published in: Labour Economics, 2012, 19 (3), 329-350
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4075
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4075
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4074
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4073
published in: Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2012, 107 (498), 833-843
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4071
published in: Journal of Public Economics, 2012, 96 (5-6), 509-519
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4069
published in: Economics of Education Review, 2011, 30 (2), 215-227
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4068
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4065
published in: Industrial Relations, 2009, 48 (4), 655-683
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4065
published in: Industrial Relations, 2009, 48 (4), 655-683
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4063
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4058
published in Journal of Labor Economics, 2013, 31 (3), 577-603.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4055
published as 'The Effects of EU Enlargement and the Temporary Measures on the German Labor Market ' in: M. Kahanec and K. F. Zimmermann (eds.), EU Labor Markets after Post-Enlargement Migration, Springer: Berlin, et al. 2009, 111-129
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4044
published in: British Journal of Industrial Relations, 2011, 49 (3), 460 - 485
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4040
published in two parts: 1) published as 'UK unemployment in the Great recessions' in: National Institute Economic Review, 2010, 214, R3-R25; 2) published as 'Underemployment in the UK in the Great Recession' in: National Institute Economic Review, 2011, 215, R1-R11
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4040
published in two parts: 1) published as 'UK unemployment in the Great recessions' in: National Institute Economic Review, 2010, 214, R3-R25; 2) published as 'Underemployment in the UK in the Great Recession' in: National Institute Economic Review, 2011, 215, R1-R11