11.691 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3939
published in: American Economic Review, 2011, 101 (2), 470-492
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3933
published in: Small Business Economics, 2011, 36 (2), 157-168
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3926
published in: Journal of Development Economics, 2011, 95 (1), 18-29
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3923
published in: Economics Letters, 2010, 106 (3), 227-229
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3921
published in: American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2010, 2 (2), 31-56
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3918
published in: Industrial Relations, 2011, 50 (2), 354-374
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3917
published in: Econometrica, 2009, 77 (4), 1047-1094
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3917
published in: Econometrica, 2009, 77 (4), 1047-1094
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3916
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3913
published by the European Commission as Economic Paper 363, 2009; and in: Filip Keereman and Istvan Szekely (eds.), Five years of an enlarged EU - a positive-sum game, Springer, Berlin et al., 2010, 63-94
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3910
revised version published as 'Vouchers and Caseworkers in Training Programs for the Unemployed' in: Empirical Economics, 2013, 45 (3), 1089-1127
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3910
revised version published as 'Vouchers and Caseworkers in Training Programs for the Unemployed' in: Empirical Economics, 2013, 45 (3), 1089-1127
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3910
revised version published as 'Vouchers and Caseworkers in Training Programs for the Unemployed' in: Empirical Economics, 2013, 45 (3), 1089-1127
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3909
published in: Labour Economics, 2011, 18 (5), 643-655
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3909
published in: Labour Economics, 2011, 18 (5), 643-655
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3908
published in: Statistica, 2012, 72 (1), 103-109
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3906
published in: Ravi Kanbur and Jan Svejnar (eds.), Labor Markets and Economic Development, London and New York: Routledge, 2009
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3905
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3905
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3899
published in: American Economic Review, 2011, 101 (4), 1410-1435