2,095 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2011
substantially revised and split up versions published as: (1) 'Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods' in: American Economic Review, 2010, 100 (1), 541-556; and (2) 'The Behavioral Validity of the Strategy Method in Public Goods Experiments', Journal of Economic Psychology, 2012, 33 (4), 897-913
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1996
published in: Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2007, 122 (2), 807-829
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1995
published in: Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2006, 22 (3), 426-444
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1986
revised version published in: Journal of Economic Surveys, 2009, 23 (3), 586-612
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1984
published in: Journal of European Economic Association, 2010, 8(5), 1034-1076
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1977
revised version published as "Punish in Public" in: Journal of Public Economics, 2011, 95 (7-8), 1006-1017
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1967
published in: Labour Economics, 2008, 15 (1), 68-77
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1964
published in: Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 2008, 24 (2), 476-488
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1955
revised version published in: American Economic Review, 2009, 99(1), 486-508
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1936
published in: Public Choice, 2010, 144 (1), 215–238
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1933
published in: Giddens, Diamond, Liddle (eds): Global Europe, Social Europe. Polity London, 2006
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1932
updated and extended version published in: OECD (2007), Benefits and Wages: OECD Indicators
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1923
published in: American Economic Review, 2006, 96 (2), 45-49
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1911
published in: Economic Journal, 2006, 116 (510), C10-C23
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1906
published in: Kyklos, 2008, 61 (2), 279-308
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1894
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1893
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1889
published in: Journal of Public Economics, 2008, 92 (3-4), 915-923
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1868
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1867
published in: Journal of Law and Economics, 2006, 49 (2), 681-706