published in: Journal of Labor Research, 2004, 25 (4), 563-597
This paper offers a critical evaluation of the notion of collective voice, advanced by Freeman
and Medoff (1984) in their pioneering contribution What Do Unions Do? It takes note of
theoretical and empirical work supportive of/consistent with the collective voice/institutional
response model, and tracks some development of the model. Equally, although much
criticism of What Do Unions Do? has been wide of the mark, there are critical areas in which
the model is deficient. These lacunae include, but are not restricted to, the lingering
imprecision of collective voice; the problem of bargaining power which calls into question the
distinction between collective voice/institutional response and the monopoly face of unionism;
the over-emphasis upon worker dissatisfaction; and, relatedly, the neglect of individual voice.
The bottom line is that the notion of union voice is urgently in need of restatement if it is to
continue to shape research into the economic consequences of unions.
We use cookies to provide you with an optimal website experience. This includes cookies that are necessary for the operation of the site as well as cookies that are only used for anonymous statistical purposes, for comfort settings or to display personalized content. You can decide for yourself which categories you want to allow. Please note that based on your settings, you may not be able to use all of the site's functions.
Cookie settings
These necessary cookies are required to activate the core functionality of the website. An opt-out from these technologies is not available.
In order to further improve our offer and our website, we collect anonymous data for statistics and analyses. With the help of these cookies we can, for example, determine the number of visitors and the effect of certain pages on our website and optimize our content.